Introducing Decision Memos: Make better decisions when it matters

Most AI tools give you one model's opinion in a chat window. You type a question, get a wall of text, and hope it's right. For casual questions, that's fine. For important decisions — architecture choices, hiring strategies, product direction — you deserve better.

Four advisors, not one

Decision Memos takes a different approach. Instead of one model, four models deliberate your question in parallel. Each plays a distinct advisory role: The Strategist thinks big-picture, The Analyst stress-tests assumptions, The Challenger breaks groupthink, and The Architect maps implementation.

The output isn't a chat message. It's a structured Decision Memo — a shareable artifact with a clear verdict, consensus scoring, individual perspectives, trade-off analysis, risks, and concrete next steps. It's the kind of document you'd get from a consulting engagement, produced in 30 seconds.

What makes it different

Consensus scoring tells you how confident to be. When all four advisors agree (strong consensus), you can move fast. When they disagree (weak consensus), the divergence map tells you exactly where and why — and that's often the most valuable insight.

The Briefing extracts context intelligently. Before deliberation begins, AI-generated follow-up questions gather the constraints, priorities, and domain context that make the difference between a generic answer and a relevant one.

The deliberation experience

The wait is part of the experience. Deliberation takes 15–30 seconds. During that time, you watch advisor snippets arrive in real-time — seeing perspectives form, disagreements emerge, and the synthesis take shape. It feels purposeful because it is.

Decision Memos is available as a web application for non-technical users and as a TypeScript SDK for developers who want to build multi-model deliberation into their own products. Both produce the same structured Decision Memo.

Important decisions deserve more than one perspective. Try it today.